cerhu > sci.* > sci.astrophysique

Pentcho Valev (18/02/2019, 16h33)
The observer (receiver) starts moving towards the light source and the frequency he measures increases (Doppler effect):

[..]

We assume that the formula

(frequency measured by observer) = (speed of light relative to observer)/(wavelength)

is correct. Then the increase in frequency is accompanied by either

(A) increase in speed of light relative to observer; wavelength is invariable

or

(B) decrease in wavelength; speed of light relative to observer is invariable.

Clearly (A) is reasonable and (B) is idiotic. Here is an illustration of the idiocy (for sound waves):

[..]

In future physics Einstein's false axiom

"Speed of light is invariable"

will be replaced with the correct axiom

"Wavelength of light is invariable".

So the formula

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

will mean that ANY frequency shift entails a speed-of-light shift.

Three valid (truthfulness of the premises guarantees truthfulness of the conclusion) arguments:

Premise 1: The wavelength of light is invariable.

Premise 2: The formula (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength) is correct.

Conclusion 1: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v.

Conclusion 2: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Gravitational time dilation does not exist - Einstein's general relativity is absurd.

Conclusion 3: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is STATIC, not expanding.

Pentcho Valev
Pentcho Valev (18/02/2019, 22h00)
Einstein knew that the constancy of the speed of light was nonsense:

John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point ofdespair." [..]

Eventually Einstein found it profitable to introduce the nonsense. Space and time were vandalized accordingly, to fit the nonsensical constancy:

"Special relativity is based on the observation that the speed of light is always the same, independently of who measures it, or how fast the source of the light is moving with respect to the observer. Einstein demonstrated that as an immediate consequence, space and time can no longer be independent, but should rather be considered a new joint entity called "spacetime." [..]

So the post-truth (post-sanity) era in science began:

[..]

Pentcho Valev
Discussions similaires
Why Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Postulate Is Nonsense

Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Nonsense That Killed Physics

Einstein's Constant Speed of Light: Consistent Nonsense

Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is Nonsense


Fuseau horaire GMT +2. Il est actuellement 12h34. | Privacy Policy